So bookmark this page and come back for the latest information. Our attorneys are committed to keeping our clients and other victims informed. Our law firm has been and will be the leading source of news, updates, and information about hair relaxer lawsuits in this country. Our attorneys also review chemical hair straightener lawsuits involving Optimum Salon and other hair perms and hair straightener products. Revlon (which is in bankruptcy but appears to have good insurance coverage for chemical hair straightener claims).Motions (Strength of Nature Global, LLC).Just for Me (TCB Naturals/Godrej Consumer Products).ORS Olive Oil Hair Relaxer (Namaste, LLC).Dark & Lovely, Ultra Sheet, etc., (L’Oréal, the most prominent defendant, a company worth nearly $225 billion).Our law firm is concentrating our efforts on the following: J., and Breyer and Kavanaugh, JJ., joined.Our lawyers are reviewing hair relaxer cancer lawsuits in all 50 states. Alito, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Roberts, C. Ginsburg, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Thomas, Sotomayor, Kagan, and Gorsuch, JJ., joined. For appellees Golden Bethune-Hill, et al.: Marc E. Heytens, Solicitor General of Virginia, Richmond, Va. For appellees Virginia State Board of Elections, et al.: Toby J. Ratner, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. For United States, as amicus curiae: Morgan L. Reply of appellants Virginia House of Delegates, et al. Joint motion of appellees for enlargement of time for oral argument and for divided argument GRANTED in part, and the time is divided as follows: 25 minutes for appellants, 10 minutes for the Solicitor General as amicus curiae, 10 minutes for appellees Virginia State Board of Elections, et al., and 15 minutes for appellees Golden Bethune-Hill, et al. Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED. Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.īrief amicus curiae of The Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law filed. Joint motion for divided argument filed by appellees. filed.īlanket Consent filed by appellees Bethune-Hill, et al. SET FOR ARGUMENT on Monday, March 18, 2019īrief of appellees Golden Bethune-Hill, et al. filed.īrief amicus curiae of Criminal Justice Legal Foundation filed.Īpplication (18A629) referred to the Court.Īpplication (18A629) denied by the Court. filed.īrief amici curiae of American Legislative Exchange Council, et al. filed.īrief amicus curiae of United States in support of neither party filed.īrief amici curiae of Lee Chatfield, in His Official Capacity as Speaker-Elect of The Michigan House of Representatives, et al. (Statement of costs received)īrief of appellants Virginia House of Delegates, et al. filed.īlanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Virginia House of Delegates, et al. Reply of applicant Virginia House of Delegates, et al. Response to application from respondents Golden Bethune Hill, et al. Response to application from respondents Virginia State Board of Elections, et al. Response to application (18A629) requested by The Chief Justice, due Thursday, December 20, 2018, by noon ET. In addition to the questions presented by the jurisdictional statement, the parties are directed to fully brief the following question: Whether appellants have standing to bring this appeal.Īpplication (18A629) for a stay pending appeal, submitted to The Chief Justice. (Distributed)įurther consideration of the question of jurisdiction is POSTPONED to the hearing of the case on the merits. Opposition to appellees' motions to dismiss or affirm from appellants Virginia House of Delegates, et al. Motion to dismiss or affirm filed by appellees Golden Bethune-Hill, et al. Motion to dismiss filed by State Appellees'. Proceedings and Orders ( key to color coding) Court adds two new cases to merits docket (Amy Howe, November 13, 2018).OT2018 #8: "Animal Magnetism" (First Mondays, November 19, 2018).Virginia House of Delegates asks justices to intervene in redistricting dispute (Amy Howe, December 14, 2018).Supreme Court declines to intervene in Virginia redistricting dispute (Amy Howe, January 8, 2019).Argument preview: Virginia racial gerrymandering case returns to Supreme Court (Amy Howe, March 11, 2019).Argument analysis: Justices divided in Virginia racial-gerrymandering case (Amy Howe, March 18, 2019).Opinion analysis: Court throws out legislators’ appeal in racial-gerrymandering case (Amy Howe, June 17, 2019).A "view" from the courtroom: A search for the elusive end of the term (Mark Walsh, June 17, 2019).Monday at the Supreme Court: Four opinions and a GVR (SCOTUStalk, June 19, 2019).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |